Identity as a Form of Categorical Synthesis

Authors

  • Khazhismel G. Tkhagapsoev Kabardino-Balkar State University, 173, Chernyshevsky str., Nalchik, 360004, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2020-5-140-149

Keywords:

cultural universals, identity, typology of identity, inversion, social identity, cognitive-cultural forms, everyday life, categorical synthesis

Abstract

The work is devoted to the analysis of the genesis of the definition of “identity”, which, having entered the scientific and discursive circulation as an official term of psychiatry, over time has found the semantic boundaries of the philosophical category in the general series of categorical measures of being and now claims the role of a spokesman for the shades of infinite diversity and the dynamic variability of existing as forms being, and the forms of human involvement in reality. Moreover, identity is regarded as a still forming (developing) categorical measure of certainty and regularity of being, something self-identity. It is shown that the semantic structure and forms of operationality of the category “identity” reflect the characteristic features of the post-classical stage of development of cognition, knowledge and forms of prediction of being: constructivism, the unity of the subject and object of cognition, the synthesis of diverse knowledge and cognitive practices. The development of the category of “identity” and its semantic faces is dominated by the role of contextual-author interpretation, which brings any discourse of identity to the plane of categorical synthesis.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-31

Issue

Section

Philosophy and Science

How to Cite

[1]
2020. Identity as a Form of Categorical Synthesis. Voprosy Filosofii. 5 (May 2020), 140‒149. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2020-5-140-149.