Religious Schemes in Social Theories

Authors

  • Kirill V. Sorvin HSE University, 20, Myasnitskaya str., Moscow, 101001, Russian Federation.
  • Maksim I. Bogachev HSE University, 20, Myasnitskaya str., Moscow, 101001, Russian Federation.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2025-4-27-38

Keywords:

polytheism, monotheism, Hegel, dialectics, methodology, constructivism, objectivism, sociology, reflection

Abstract

The article discusses the problem of synthesis of opposing sociological theories. The principles of such synthesis are most clearly presented in Hegel’s concept of the God-human idea of Christianity, interpreted by the philosopher as a dialec­tical-reflexive synthesis of the principles of mono-, poly- and pantheism. The po­sition on society as a genuine object of religious worship, substantiated in so­ciology, allowed the authors to put forward a hypothesis about the existence of a structural similarity between mono-, poly- and pantheistic religious teach­ings and sociological theories. The conducted research confirmed that the onto­logical and normative features of monotheistic and polytheistic worldviews iden­tified by Hegel were respectively found in Durkheim’s object sociology and in constructivism. Their common feature turned out to be the ontological opposi­tion: God and Man in religious doctrines, Society and Man in social theories. Such incomplete reflexivity in Hegelian theory was resolved through the doc­trine of the unity of divine and human nature, connecting all elements into
a reflexive trinity. In the final part of the work, the authors raise the question of the methodological conditions under which “pansociologism” could become the basis for a “triune synthesis” of antinomic social theories.

Published

2025-04-06

Issue

Section

Philosophy and Science

How to Cite

[1]
2025. Religious Schemes in Social Theories. Voprosy Filosofii. 4 (Apr. 2025), 27–38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2025-4-27-38.