A Phenomenological Renewal of Metaphysics? Bernhard Welte vs Semyon Frank
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2025-2-179-190Keywords:
metaphysics, phenomenology, omniscience, holy, proofs of God’s being, Bernhard Welte, Rudolf Otto, Semyon FrankAbstract
The topic of the article is a comparative study of the Revelation thinking in Russian philosophy and German Catholic theology on the example of transformation of classical metaphysics within the framework of the use, development, anticipation of Semyon Frank and Bernhard Welte, primarily, phenomenological philosophy of Husserl and fundamental ontology of Heidegger. The topic proposed by the authors involves a comparison of Rudolf Otto’s and Welte’s phenomenology of the sacred, an analysis of the phenomenological meaning of Thomas Aquinas’ proof of God’s existence in Welte’s case, and, finally, a comparative study of Welte’s and Frank’s projects of metaphysical renewal. The authors come to the conclusion that Frank and Welte sacrifice the nature of classical metaphysics (Neoplatonic and Thomist) for the sake of creating distinctive versions of non-classical metaphysics. Welte, rethinking metaphysics in the key of a phenomenological ontology of the sacred, actualizes its meaning in existential, dialogical, personal, i.e. religious thinking. Frank attempts to synthesize strategies of cognition that are difficult to connect and critical of classical metaphysics. Namely, Descartes’ metaphysics of the subject, Bergson’s philosophy of intuitionism, Husserl’s phenomenology, and others.