The Crooked Mirror of Digitalization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-2-25-33Keywords:
digital age, media revolution, information and communication technologies, media risks, post-truth, digital well-being, the human dimension of digitalization.Abstract
The article analyzes the contradictory effects of using digital, in particular, information and communication technologies, arising at various social levels, from the transformation of social interaction practices to personal deviations. Rapid and drastic changes in the format of communication and methods of collecting and transmitting information, the ubiquity of special devices and high-tech devices indicate the digital media revolution that has taken place. However, the expected sense of digital well-being that arises due to the acceleration of socio-economic processes and the expansion of the geography of contacts is being devalued due to the explosive spread of practices of mutual deception and manipulation, post-truth as a norm, targeted filtering and personally limited selection of information, mass invasions of private spaces, the heyday of cyber crime, cognitive degradation. The article highlights the anthropological problems associated with digitalization, including the transformation of cognitive and communicative practices, the loss of skill and depth of reflection and empathy, paradoxical contradictions between the need to protect the privacy of personal life and unprecedented publicity, constant presence in the social network and the desire to close in a safe “information cocoon” and others. The author notes the social problems caused by the spread and dependence of society on digital technologies: the devaluation of true information and its replacement with a purposefully constructed politically biased post-truth, the crisis in intergenerational relations, the dependence of satisfaction with digitalization depending on age, place of residence, availability of digital technologies. The study raises questions about the possibility and criteria of human-dimensional digitalization, which makes it possible to harmoniously overcome these challenges and minimize the consequences of a technocentric worldview, and about the reasonable restriction of using and development of autonomous intelligent systems competing with humans.