Dialogue against the Background of Time

Authors

  • Anastasia G. Gacheva Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 25a, Povarskaya str., Moscow, 121069, Russian Federation; Moscow Higher School of Social and Economic Sciences, 3/5, build 1, Gazetny lane, Moscow, 125009, Russian Federation; Fedorov’s Library No. 180 of the Association of cultural centers of the South-Western Administrative District of Moscow, 92, Profsoyuznaya str., Moscow, 117485, Russian Federation.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-1-137-142

Keywords:

creativity of M.M. Prishvin, A.K. Gorsky, ideological and creative dialogue, the ideal of building a new world, Bolshevism, the ways of Christianity, philosophy of N.F. Fedorov, art as transfiguration, liturgism.

Abstract

Taking into account new factual data, the spiritual and creative dialogue between the writer and the thinker M.M. Prishvin and philosopher, poet A.K. Gorsky,
unfoldning from 1922 to 1943, is considered. Proposed by Gorsky reading of N.F. Fedorov’s Philosophy of the common task in the light of modernity, the desire to expand on its basis the ideal of building a new world, the idea of the deep unity of Christian feat and the feat of art, the idea of the creative trans­formation of eros find a living reaction in Prishvin’s diaries, meeting with his own thoughts about eros and sex, the prospects of Bolshevism and the common task of the resurrection of the fathers. Gorsky’s interpretation of the novel The Chain of Koschei is considered in the context of the crisis of symbolism and the search for new ways of life-creative action based on the ideas of active Christianity. It is shown that Prishvin for Gorsky embodies the type of artist-messenger, ascending from adamism to liturgism, and Gorsky for Prishvin is the type of Christian fig­ure who overcomes the inertia of official Orthodoxy, its passivity and deviation into the otherworldly. The evolution of Prishvin’s attitude to Gorsky’s thesis on the need to transform Soviet ideology on the basis of the Philosophy of the Com­mon Task is revealed (the acceptance of this thesis in the 1920s, the dispute with it during the era of repression, the return to the idea of the religious and moral re­newal of communism during the Great Patriotic War). Unlike Gorsky, who sought to express his word, Prishvin in the late 1930s chooses a position of silence, under­standing this silence as a kind of hidden action.

Published

2024-01-31

Issue

Section

To The 150th Anniversary of Michail M. Prishvin

How to Cite

[1]
2024. Dialogue against the Background of Time. Voprosy Filosofii. 1 (Jan. 2024), 137–142. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-1-137-142.