On Philosophy Circles with Felix Mikhailov
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-9-182-192Keywords:
logic, method, conversion, labor, dialectics, beginning, a priori, apodicticity, concept, conscience, being and nothingness, integrity, language, Self.Abstract
In the article, in the form of a co-reflection with Felix Mikhailov, two internally related problems are revealed: the beginning of human existence and the logical form as a condition for analyzing the beginning. Setting himself the task of revealing the nature of the logical beginning and thereby showing the nature of the creative process, Mikhailov is looking for answers in a wide space of science, in various philosophical concepts, in logical positivism, existentialism, and psychology. Here he is looking for the principles of logical thinking, it’s a priori forms and apodictic character. Reflecting on these searches, the author of the article critically analyzes the methodological dead ends that arise here. In particular, Mikhailov’s idea of the initial beginning of the construction of cultural and historical human existence – the so-called “concept of conversion” – has no adequate theoretical justification, the argumentation is based on existential and psychological content rather than on a logical form. The author of the article actualizes and analyzes these problems, wishing to show the productivity of appealing to the work of a prominent Russian philosopher who awakened a wide range of philosophical, psychological and pedagogical issues.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2025-02-07 (2)
- 2022-09-30 (1)