National Policy as a Factor in the Creation and Disintegration of the USSR

Authors

  • Grigorii L. Tulchinskii National Research University “Higher School of Economics” – St. Petersburg, 16, Soyuza Pechatnikov str., Saint Petersburg, 190121, Russian Federation; Saint Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2021-12-101-111

Keywords:

bourgeois revolution, civic identity, internationalism, modernization, national politics, nation, nationality, ethnicity, ethno-federalism.

Abstract

National policy played a non-trivial and controversial role in the establishment, formation, development and collapse of the Soviet state. Nations were for the bol­sheviks a bourgeois vestige that was dying away with the construction of a social­ist society. However, having seized power in a peasant country, they were forced to build a new state, counting on the entry of various peoples into it. A result was the ethno-federalist design of the USSR under the de facto centralism of the lead­ership of the Communist Party by complex balances and compromises. This soci­ety underwent a complex evolution, during which the country was drawn into modernization, which changed the social structure of society with a new system of demands and interests of the elites, which led to a relatively painless collapse of the USSR. Contemporary Russia is a society, on the one hand, with the domi­nance of the urban population, the way of life of an information society of mass consumption and the demand for civic identity as the basis for the consolidation of society is being formed in the country. On the other hand, the primordialist (ethno-cultural) nation understanding dominates in legal acts, journalism, public opinion. The problem solution presupposes a constructive public dialogue.

Published

2021-12-31

Issue

Section

Philosophy, Culture, Society

How to Cite

[1]
2021. National Policy as a Factor in the Creation and Disintegration of the USSR. Voprosy Filosofii. 12 (Dec. 2021), 101–111. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2021-12-101-111.