Mythogenesis and Anthropogenesis

Authors

  • Andrey P. Zabiyako Amur State University, 21, Ignatievskoe highway, Blagoveshchensk, 675027, Russian Federation.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2021-3-57-67

Keywords:

mythogenesis, mythology, religion, anthropogenesis, Homo, language, imagination, petroglyphs, mobile art, Paleolithic

Abstract

In the period of the 19th – beginning of the 21th century in the study of mythol­ogy three paradigms of the study of mythogenesis have consistently dominated – historical, non-historical and historical-cognitive. The historical-cognitive para­digm is based on the latest scientific results in the field of archeology, anthro­pology and cognitive science. The modern model of anthropogenesis assumes the existence of general regularities of development of three types of Homo – Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans. There are reasons that are not only Homo sapiens, but also the Neanderthals and Denisovans had high cognitive ca­pabilities and signs of modern human behavior. The most important foundations of mythogenesis are the functioning of language and the activity of the imagina­tion. All three populations of ancient mankind reached a cognitive minimum, which opened the way to mythogenesis. Signs of mythogenesis are clearly recorded no later than the time of the transition from the Middle to Upper Pale­olithic, during the Early Aurignacian, but the beginning of this process goes back to an earlier period.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-31

Issue

Section

Philosophy, Religion, Culture

How to Cite

[1]
2021. Mythogenesis and Anthropogenesis. Voprosy Filosofii. 3 (Mar. 2021), 57–67. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2021-3-57-67.