Kang Youwei: Confucian category of filial piety in front the face of modernity. Kang Youwei. Datong shu. Part 6. Partial Translation by Dmitry E. Martynov.

Authors

  • Dmitry E. Martynov Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, 1/55, Pushkin str., Kazan, 420111, Tatarstan, Russian Federation
  • Yulia A. Martynova Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, 1/55, Pushkin str., Kazan, 420111, Tatarstan, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2020-7-190-201

Keywords:

Kang Youwei, Datong shu, Qing era, Confucianism, social institutes, family institute, modern

Abstract

Readers are invited to the first Russian translation of extracts from the first chap­ter of the sixth part Datong shu (The Book of the Great Unity) by Kang Youwei (1858‒1927). The famous Chinese thinker and outstanding reformer played a prominent role in the process of incorporating traditional Chinese culture into the global context and personally did a lot for a lively dialogue with the Western civilization. Between 1899 and 1913 Kang visited more than 30 countries and made three round-the-world travels. In his multifaceted treatise “Datong shu”, a special place was occupied by a description of the historical concept of the Three Eras, in accordance with which value systems, religions and social in­stitutions were considered. Evolutionary sequence was thought in both spatial and temporal aspects. Kang Youwei considered his contemporaneity as a transi­tional stage from the Era of chaos to the Era of rising equilibrium, the threshold of which reached the most advanced Western societies. However, in an emo­tional sense, Kang Youwei resolutely defended himself the traditional Chinese clan system, which, as he understood it, opposed an atomized Western society dominated by hedonistic values.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-31

Issue

Section

Chinese Philosophy

How to Cite

[1]
2020. Kang Youwei: Confucian category of filial piety in front the face of modernity. Kang Youwei. Datong shu. Part 6. Partial Translation by Dmitry E. Martynov. Voprosy Filosofii. 7 (Jul. 2020), 190‒201. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2020-7-190-201.