3D dialectics (Philosophy of complementarity)

Authors

  • Givi V. Givishvili Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation (IZMIRAN), 4, Kaluzhskoe shosse, Troitsk, 108844, Russian Federation.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2020-2-188-195

Keywords:

philosophy, dialectics, logic, complementarity principle, humanism, man, super-strong anthropic principle.

Abstract

It is argued that the laws of dialectics, defined by G. Hegel, have a limit charac­ter. They are based on a 2-dimensional logic of Aristotle and insufficient for an adequate description of the phenomena of nature and the human world. The problem of plenitude of the description is partly solved by the inclusion of the complementarity principle, formulated by N. Bohr, in: a) a 2-dimensional ("flat") logic with its conversion to a 3-dimensional ("volumetric") logic; b) a di­alectical triad as a fourth law. The complementarity principle also solves the problem of the relationship between: a) a person (a thinking mind) and nature in the form of super-strong anthropic principle (SAP); b) man-society-state in the form of a broad interpretation of the concept of “humanism”.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-29

Issue

No. 2 (2020)

Section

Letters to Editors

How to Cite

[1]
2020. 3D dialectics (Philosophy of complementarity). Voprosy Filosofii. 2 (Feb. 2020), 188‒195. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2020-2-188-195.