How Should Respect for Human Dignity be Understood Today?

Authors

  • Andrei А. Tsiatserkin Belarusian State Medical University, 83, Dzerzhinski av., Minsk, 220116, Republic of Belarus.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2020-2-38-50

Keywords:

democratic ethics, human dignity, autonomy, beneficence, fairness, treating as a mere means, benefit, instrumentalization, objectification, exploitation, depersonalization, commodification.

Abstract

Human dignity is acknowledged to be the core value for the ethics of human rights. At the same time, it is considered to be an empty signifier, which does not have its own meaning. The objective of the article is to find a clear sense for this principle which should be different to the meanings of other fundamental demo­cratic values: justice as equality, justice as fairness, autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, care or respect for persons. The author argues that we should under­stand respect for human dignity only as the anti-instrumentalization principle, which prohibits using a human being merely as a means. Accordingly, respect for human dignity is not violated when all subjects derive benefits from the rela­tionship of mutual instrumentalization. In the paper the other forms of the objec­tification of subjects (exploitation, violence, depersonalization, commodifica­tion, ownership, inertness, denial of autonomy) are also analyzed. The author concludes that in the first place many of these cases are based not on disrespect for human dignity, but on the violation of other principles.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-29

Issue

Section

Philosophy and Society

How to Cite

[1]
2020. How Should Respect for Human Dignity be Understood Today?. Voprosy Filosofii. 2 (Feb. 2020), 38–50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2020-2-38-50.