The Concept of “A Priori Synthetic Judgments” in the Philosophy of Mathematics of Kant and Poincaré. “A Priori Synthetic Judgments” in Kant’s Interpretation of Mathematical Knowledge

Authors

  • Viacheslav I. Kotsiuba Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 9, Institutskiy per., Dolgoprudny, 141701, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2025-2-105-115

Keywords:

philosophy of mathematics, I. Kant, a priori synthetic judgments, A. Poincaré

Abstract

The article analyzes the concept of a priori synthetic judgment in the concept of mathematical knowledge of I. Kant, examines the prehistory of this concept in pre-critical Kantian philosophy, examines the connection of Kant’s ideas about mathematics with his contemporary concepts of mathematical know­ledge (Wolf, Lambert), the gradual divergence of Kant from Leibniz-Wolfian philosophical tradition. The foundations and characteristic features of Kant’s doctrine of a priori synthetic judgments are reconstructed for subsequent compa­rison of this doctrine with the concept of a priori synthetic judgment in the phi­losophy of science of Henri Poincaré. Particular attention is paid to Kant’s expressions “pure contemplation” and “construction of concepts”, which cha­racterize the specifics of mathematical knowledge in Kant. Kant finds the basis of a priori synthesis in the faculty of imagination, and the basis of synthetic unity necessary for the construction of synthetic judgments in the unity of apper­ception. During the critical period, a priori synthesis for Kant is not only the ba­sis of mathematical knowledge, but also the knowledge of objects. In Kant, it is pure intuition that makes mathematical knowledge possible, expressing itself in a priori synthetic judgments.

Published

2025-02-03

Issue

Section

History of Philosophy

How to Cite

[1]
2025. The Concept of “A Priori Synthetic Judgments” in the Philosophy of Mathematics of Kant and Poincaré. “A Priori Synthetic Judgments” in Kant’s Interpretation of Mathematical Knowledge. Voprosy Filosofii. 2 (Feb. 2025), 105–115. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2025-2-105-115.